Showing posts with label strangeness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strangeness. Show all posts

The Amateurs, by Nadine Gordimer

BIOGRAPHY

Nadine Gordimer was born in 1923 in Springs, Transvaal, South Africa, and died at 91 in Johannesburg, its largest city.

Her parents were Jewish; they had fled from pogroms in Eastern Europe, but she wasn’t educated religiously. Nevertheless, her parents sent her to a catholic school, although, after a time, she left school and was raised at home because some heart problems her mother thought dangerous.

At home she read a lot, and from a very young age, she started to write stories.

Later, she studied Law at Witwatersrand University, but only for a year, and so she didn’t complete her degree. But there she started to mix with Black people and to understand their situation, the meaning of segregation and later of apartheid.

When she was 25, she moved to Johannesburg. She married a dentist with whom she had a daughter. They got divorced and she got married again in 1954 to an art dealer. This marriage lasted until her husband’s death. They got a son.

But she didn’t stop writing or trying to publish her stories, and in 1949, she published her first collection, Face to Face. Then, two years later, the magazine The New Yorker issued one of her stories, and she continued publishing there for a long time. Although she also wrote some novels, she said that the 20th century literary genre par excellence was the short story, because it’s a way to see an event “by the light of a flash”, and because every short story is “a discrete moment of truth”.

She was an activist against the apartheid, and some of her books were banned in South Africa. In 1960, they arrested her best friend, and the police shot Black people during a pacific demonstration in Sharpeville, a “Black location”. From that moment, she became firmly committed to Mandela’s African National Congress. She helped Mandela in his 1962 trial when he delivered his famous three-hour speech, “I Am Prepared to Die”.

In post-apartheid times, she was active in movements related to AIDS, and she was vice-president of International PEN.

As a curiosity, she rejected being nominate for the Orange Prize in 1998… because it was only for women.

Also, when asked about Israeli policies, she always said that they didn’t have anything to do with the apartheid system, and she was criticised for this opinion.

 

SUMMARY

The Amateurs is one of Gordimer’s first stories. It was published in the collection Face to Face. It has, like much of her narrative, some autobiographical details. Nadine, as a teenager, played the part of Gwendolen in The Importance of Being Earnest, by Oscar Wilde, in an amateur company.

In the story, a group of white do-gooders went to a Location, that is, a Black people slum (later called “townships”) to perform the Oscar Wilde’s play. At the beginning, they couldn’t find the place where they had to play, but they felt that it was a poor quarter. Then came a boy, a policeman, who led them to the right place. There was a bit of misunderstanding because it was thought that it would be a concert, instead of a play. All in all, they were placed in a poor room (not exactly a dressing room) where they could get dressed and put on their make-up. As they had seen what kind of audience they were going to have, they became aware that it would be a difficult play for them, that they wouldn’t understand anything, and so it wouldn’t be necessary to dress up too much.

In the first act, most of the spectators were teachers, or clerks or civil servants. As the actors and actresses realized they didn’t grasp the subtility and the irony of the text, they began to act out more histrionically in order to elicit more laughter from the audience.

The first act finished, the people who were outside the hall because they weren’t invited or because they didn’t feel like going in, entered the house and filled it up. Now there were all kinds of people there, even babies, and sitting even on the floor. So, there was a full house, although some people didn’t pay much attention to the play. The actors and actresses went on overdoing voices and gestures, and thus throwing away the spirit of the play.

At the end of it, they collected a very long round of applause, and a girl from the audience gave the players a moving speech thanking them and telling the Location youth to follow the example of the performers to improve their behaviour and to be useful to their community.

The company of actors and actresses left the place with mixed feelings: happy because they had made some people happy, and sad because they think they had betrayed the piece and cheated the audience.

It’s important to note that at no point does the narrator mention the characters’ skin colour. Nor can we find any hint about the time period when the story is set.

 

QUESTIONS

-Why do you think the narrator didn’t mention skin colours?

-In your opinion, is it so difficult to understand The Importance of Being Earnest? Do you need to have a higher education to enjoy some works of art?

-Overdoing the performance, did they cheat the audience? Or were they only being didactic?

-Oscar Wilde said: “It is the problem of slavery, and we try to solve it by amusing the slaves”. And “Philanthropic people lose all sense of humanity. It’s their distinguishing characteristic”. In your view, philanthropy has good, or bad effects, on the people who get its “benefits”?

-Do you agree with Gordimer’s opinion about the Orange Prize and about Israeli politics?

 

VOCABULARY

props, drain, wash, knobkerrie, lean-to, straggling, shrilly, bustle, sideburn, drawing room, pouter-pigeon, long-hipped, colour bar, belched, hamming, splurged out, knocked up, tittered,

 

 

Ajax, by Graham Swift

AJAX, by Cristina Fernández

SUMMARY

A schoolboy called James lives in the neighbourhood with his mother and father.

A weird man lives in the next house.

Although Mr Wilkinson is educated, respectable, interesting and well-dressed, he is not the “normal family”, he lives alone in his fifties, and he likes to practice sports in his garden in underpants and chanting, in all weathers, therefore he is fit, muscular and well-built.

While the boy feels adoration and beguiling for that man, his mother and the neighbourhood dislike him because he hasn’t a “normal” job: he receives patients at home and practices alternative medicine. Besides, his visitors are young girls too.

One day, while James is playing with flowers in the garden, is asked by Mr. Wilkinson if he’s a vegetarian, and so the boy thinks the adult is.

Another day, the man asks the boy for something to clear drains, and he gives the man Ajax, and it’s explained to be the name of a Greek myth. The boy sees blood in that water and explains everything to their parents. The boy thinks he’s not a vegetarian.

Mr. Wilkinson had to leave, a police man asked questions to the boy and a normal family moved in, what the whole street wanted.

When the boy grew up, he studied to be a Greek teacher in Oxford college, was homosexual and weird and discovered that “Ajax” was a Greek warrior who went mad mistaking sheep for people.

 

PERSONAL OPINION

The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that maybe Mr Wilkinson used to practice abortions to the young girls that visited him.

That the parents of the boy perhaps thought that the man had tried to abuse sexually the boy.

I think that this neighbour was the first platonic love of the boy who influenced him in his future career, not minding being weird.

I am convinced that respectability rejects everything that is new, different and free.


QUESTIONS

-“Weirdo” is a bit offensive. Nowadays, we tend to use euphemisms. Do you think that a change of words can change the reality?

-“I was too young to have opinions of my own.” In older times, you could start giving opinions only when you reached a specific age. Does it seem right for you?

-“I was driven into taking an opposite view.” In which cases new generations do the opposite to old generations?

-Do you remember the film “In and Out”? There is a scene where a student says all the qualities of a gay man. Is it only a cliché?

According to the English novels, you are a gentleman or a gentlewoman if you are rich, you have a title, or you have an education. Is there any other way to be a gentleman or a gentlewoman?

-“Anyone can do what they like in the privacy of their own home.” Is that an absolute right?

-What do you think about name’s shortening or nicknaming (James to Jim or Jimmy)?

-Do you think being a vegetarian is a way to be different? Is there something you can call a “normal diet”?

-Do you remember the famous admonition “Don’t talk to strangers”? Were our parents right?

-What do you know about “alternative medicines”?

-What were your experiences with doctors when you were a child?

-In your opinion, why did Mr Wilkinson show the narrator boy how he cleaned the drains?

-What do you think Mr Wilkinson did to earn his living? How do you know?

-How did you decide to study what you wanted to be?

-The new residents, the Fletchers, in Mr Wilkinson’s house were a couple with their first baby: can you see the irony?

-What do you know about Ajax, from the Greek mythology? Do you remember more literary names used as a brand name?

-“If you’re a professor of Greek, you’re allowed to be that”: Do you think there is a relation between sexual tendency and studies or job?

 

 

VOCABULARY

weirdo, undoing, doff, cut above, educated, look up, medley, chanting, semis, beret, kit bag, tinkered, trellis, stoopingness, pebble-dashing, abiding, clinch, held much water, scotched, pinned him down, gruff, drains, bother, sporting, sly, rush, hazardous, scouring, enthralled, beguiling, tantalizingol, slop, gutter, squeamish, capped, slander, unwitting, bereft, Fellow's gown, smoothed over, tenet


Through the Tunnel, by Doris Lessing


Doris Lessing at the Wikipedia




BIOGRAPHY


Doris Lessing was born in Iran in 1919. At that moment, Iran was under the rule of Great Britain. Her father was a bank clerk and her mother a nurse. When she was 5, her family moved to Rhodesia, today Zimbabwe, but then also under the British Empire. There she lived until she was 30. Her family had a farm, but not much money, and she went to a catholic school. At 15, she started working as a nursemaid. At 19, she got married and had two children, but she left her husband and her children. Afterwards, she said, “There’s nothing more boring for an intelligent woman than to spend an endless amount of time with small children.” But she got married again and had one more son, and she divorced again. She left also Rhodesia and went to live in the UK, fed up with the classicism and racism of the African country.

All her life was a committed person with leftist politics, and until the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956, she belonged to the Communist Party.

She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2007.

When the critics talk about her writings, they usually distinguish three periods:

The Communist period, when she wrote mainly about social issues. Her African Stories, for example, belong to this phase.

The psychological period, when she wrote Children of Violence (a collection of five semi-autobiographical novels),  and The Golden Notebook, that is in fact a revision of these 5 novels.

The Sufi period, when she studied the Muslim mysticism called Sufi and when she wrote science-fiction novels, for example, the series Canopus in Argus.

Out of these periods we found The Good Terrorist, about the squatters in London.

Her work is sometimes wearisomely didactic and focused more about topics than about form.

She is considered a feminist writer, although she doesn’t like being labelled.

She died in 2013 in London, when she was 93.

If you'd like to know more about her life, you can read her autobiography Under my Skin, in two volumes of more of 400 pages each one.


Through the Tunnel This is a story about an eleven-year-old boy on holiday on the coast with his widow mother. Every year they go there, and sunbathe and swim on the same big beach, but now he feels boring spending the time with his mother on this beach, because he thinks he has grown up, and this big and safe beach is for small children and mothers. So he decides to explore a cove near the big beach. There he sees some boys doing feats of old boys or adults; for example, they dive to the sea from a high rock, or swim under a long rock. The boys ignore him, because when he sees that he cannot do the same as them, he behaves like a child. Then, when he’s alone, he studies the passage under the long rock that they have crossed, and tries to cross it too. But it’s very long and dark. He’s going to need some goggles and is going to have to practise his breathing… because he’s decided to go through the tunnel whatever happens. Is he going to get it at the end?


QUESTIONS


Why do you think the author talks about the “woman’s arm” instead of talking simply about the “woman”?

In the lines 20-21 we find the expression “impulse of contrition – a sort of chivalry”. How can you identify contrition with chivalry?

There are two beaches: the big one and the small cove or ravine. It seems that the big beach is for children and the ravine for adults. What characteristics does the author give to each one in order to identify the big one with children and the rocky ravine with adultness?

What kind of relationship is there between the mother and her son?

Jerry tries to talk to the group of boys that are having a swim; but they speak the local language and Jerry doesn’t. How difficult is to make friends with someone who speaks a different language? Do children and young people make friends more easily than mature people?

The gang of local boys have a leader. Do all the gangs have to have a leader? What are the qualities that a leader has to have (according to your opinion)?

There is a moment when Jerry acts out a foolish dog. Why do you think he reacts like this?

Jerry asks (in fact, demands) for some goggles and wants to have them immediately. What is the best way to behave in front of a demanding child?

Do you think that every child needs, in order to grow up, to get through a rite of passage?

The narrator says, “He would do it if it killed him”. Do you think this is a sign of maturity? Was his a sensible decision?

Why, when he could be a member of the gang, “he did not want them”?

It seems that the mother was unconscious of the dangers her child was in. Are we usually aware of the dangers our children are in?

What do you think is the meaning of the blood filling the goggles in relation to coming of age?

Why wasn’t Jerry’s mother impressed when he told her he could stay for more than two minutes under water?

VOCABULARY

blurted out, villa, worrying off, scoop, inlets, surf, craving, poised, bog, blank, feat, nagged, sequins, groped, frond, dizzy, overdo, weed, gout, scooped, glazed looking