Showing posts with label sea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sea. Show all posts

How Pearl Button Was Kidnapped, by Katherine Mansfield


SUMMARY

Pearl Button is a little girl living in a big and rich house, a kind of house that she calls House of Boxes. At the moment of the story, she is playing in the garden, when two big and fat women (perhaps native New Zealander people or gipsies) get there. They liked the child very much and offer her to go with them. At first, the girl has some doubts, but, as the two women seem very nice and wear coloured robes, she decides to go. So they go away from the girl’s house on foot, but, after a while, the girl feels tired, and one of the women carry her. They arrive to their camp; there everybody is very nice, and they give her some fruit. She likes it very much, and, although she stains her dress, nobody worries about it. Then they leave their camp and drive on carts until they reach the beach; Pearl has never seen the sea and she’s amazed and happy. She sees the small houses where these happy people live; the women take off her clothes, and all of them go to the shore. A small wave wets Pearl’s feet and, after the first surprise, she enjoys it very much. But, at this moment, policemen arrive to rescue the girl.

But, was the girl really kidnapped? Or is it better to say that she ran away from her boring life? Were the two women kidnapping her? Or were they only inviting her?

To be happy, do you have to break the rules, do you have to escape from the routine?

There is a narrator in this story, but sometimes this narrator uses the characters’ words and thoughts to tell the story, e.g., “House of Boxes”. What is the effect of this? Don’t you feel nearer the characters? The distance between narrator and character is broken and you are aware you know better their feelings, their points of view.

AUDIOBOOK

 

QUESTIONS

What does the name’s girl suggest to you?

What resources does the author use to make the two women nice for us?

What does a “House of Boxes” look like?

Do you think the girl cried because she was afraid? How do you know?

“The woman was warm as a cat”. What animal do you think is the best pet for a child? Why?

Are fat people nicer or kinder, according to the cliché? Are they more “comfortable”?

Why dies the writer says “[the water] stopped being blue in her hands”?

Who were the “little men in blue coats”? How do you know?

What do you know about the Stockholm syndrome?

 

VOCABULARY

swung, rugs, whip, briar, nestled, purring, paddock, coaxed

The Raft of the Medusa, by Julian Barnes

Théodore Géricault




The Raft of The Medusa at the Wikipedia

Julian Barnes at the Wikipedia

A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters at the Wikipedia

Analysis

New York Times review


The short story you’re going to read is a bit different from the ones we have read until now, but don’t get scared, because I’m going to help you.

The story has two very different parts.

The first part narrates the shipwreck, so it has a lot of naval vocabulary (there is a glossary below), but don’t worry about it: to understand what happened you don’t even it to look up these words in a dictionary: just go on reading. The event is more or less like this: in the year 1816 a group of four French ships sailing from a port near La Rochelle were heading south along the African coast. Due to the incompetence of the commandments and/or adverse winds, the group of ships got separated, and the last one got stuck in a reef and couldn’t go on sailing at all; so the commandments ordered to leave the ship, but, as there were not enough boats for all the passengers and crew, they decided to build a raft that would be towed by the boats. But the raft couldn’t support so much weight, and they had to throw away some food and drink; even so, when everybody was on board, the raft was more than half a metre under water, and almost everybody on the raft had their legs under water. But the worst was that the boats cut the ropes that were tied to the raft to tow it, abandon it to their own fate and went away. The situation on the raft was desperate: they didn’t have instruments to navigate, neither rows nor a sail; they fight for better positions on the raft and for food and water; during the night it was a storm; a lot of people died or were murdered or committed suicide; there were cases of cannibalism… At the end, only a few survived on the raft and were rescued by the ship Argus. The survivals had decided to write down the events, and so now we know a lot of details of the story.

The second part narrates how Théodore Géricault painted The Raft of the Medusa (Medusa being the name of the stranded ship) and what was the public opinion about the painting. This second part of the story doesn’t have vocabulary problems (I think), but perhaps it isn't as moving as the first one, and it demands an effort extra as it goes into art.

Julian Barnes is very keen on art and has a book of essays about paintings and painters called Keeping an Eye Open and the novel The Man in the RedCoat with a lot of art inside, or The Noise of the Time about the Russian musician Shostakovich… So in his books we find a lot of history, art and also politics.

This is the cover of the book I bought thirty years ago. In it, you can see the Ark of Noah and a part of a spaceship floating in a stormy sea in an intent to convey the contents of the book: the history and the sea. The idea of the book is similar to another famous book by Stefan Zweig: Decisive Moments in History: Twelve Historical Miniatures. So, Barnes tells us about ten “and a half moment” in the History (real or literary) of the world but under a fictional vision with a short story form.

QUESTIONS for the first part of the story 

Tell us in your words what the bad omen was.

What happened in the Canary Islands?

Why was Senegal important for the French?

What do you know about famous rafts? What do you know about the raft of Odysseus?

Do you remember other famous shipwrecks?

What do you know about the myth of Medusa?

When the raft was ready with all the people on it, they shouted “Vive le Roi!” What political moment was France in?

Tell us about the sufferings of the shipwrecked people.

What cruel or repugnant but necessary actions did the shipwrecked do? What would you do in your case?

What happened to the people who didn’t want to abandon the ship?

Who rescued the shipwrecked, and what did the survivors do afterwards?

 

QUESTIONS about Scene of Shipwreck, by Géricault

 

Do you remember any film or novel about catastrophes? Why do you think we like this kind of films if we already know how they end?

What do you know about Géricault (not the biography, but some curious or interesting fact)?

Géricault shaved his head in order not to see anyone and be locked in his studio working. Do you know more cases of artists who had to do something radical to keep on working?

What human resources did Géricault use to paint more realistically his painting?

What can you tell us about Delacroix?

“You can tell more by showing less”: What does this saying mean? Can you give some examples?

What do you think about the title “Scene of Shipwreck”? What other title would you have given to the picture?

Who is Venus Anadyomene?

What differences do you remember between the painting and the real facts?
As we can see that cannibalism is taboo in most societies, do you think eating meat would be so in some years?


(some) VOCABULARY (in context)

portent = augury
porpoises = sea mammals similar to dolphins
frigate, corvette, flute, brig = different kind of ships
banian fig
shallows = not deep water
lead = heavy metal used to measure the depth
ensign = junior lieutenant
luffing = losing wind
have a heel = incline to one side
astern = behind
pinnace = boat
soundings = measuring (the depth of the water)
billows = big waves
tags = strips of (e.g.) metal
pewter = metal mixture of tin and lead
supernumerary = extra

Through the Tunnel, by Doris Lessing


Doris Lessing at the Wikipedia




BIOGRAPHY


Doris Lessing was born in Iran in 1919. At that moment, Iran was under the rule of Great Britain. Her father was a bank clerk and her mother a nurse. When she was 5, her family moved to Rhodesia, today Zimbabwe, but then also under the British Empire. There she lived until she was 30. Her family had a farm, but not much money, and she went to a catholic school. At 15, she started working as a nursemaid. At 19, she got married and had two children, but she left her husband and her children. Afterwards, she said, “There’s nothing more boring for an intelligent woman than to spend an endless amount of time with small children.” But she got married again and had one more son, and she divorced again. She left also Rhodesia and went to live in the UK, fed up with the classicism and racism of the African country.

All her life was a committed person with leftist politics, and until the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956, she belonged to the Communist Party.

She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2007.

When the critics talk about her writings, they usually distinguish three periods:

The Communist period, when she wrote mainly about social issues. Her African Stories, for example, belong to this phase.

The psychological period, when she wrote Children of Violence (a collection of five semi-autobiographical novels),  and The Golden Notebook, that is in fact a revision of these 5 novels.

The Sufi period, when she studied the Muslim mysticism called Sufi and when she wrote science-fiction novels, for example, the series Canopus in Argus.

Out of these periods we found The Good Terrorist, about the squatters in London.

Her work is sometimes wearisomely didactic and focused more about topics than about form.

She is considered a feminist writer, although she doesn’t like being labelled.

She died in 2013 in London, when she was 93.

If you'd like to know more about her life, you can read her autobiography Under my Skin, in two volumes of more of 400 pages each one.


Through the Tunnel This is a story about an eleven-year-old boy on holiday on the coast with his widow mother. Every year they go there, and sunbathe and swim on the same big beach, but now he feels boring spending the time with his mother on this beach, because he thinks he has grown up, and this big and safe beach is for small children and mothers. So he decides to explore a cove near the big beach. There he sees some boys doing feats of old boys or adults; for example, they dive to the sea from a high rock, or swim under a long rock. The boys ignore him, because when he sees that he cannot do the same as them, he behaves like a child. Then, when he’s alone, he studies the passage under the long rock that they have crossed, and tries to cross it too. But it’s very long and dark. He’s going to need some goggles and is going to have to practise his breathing… because he’s decided to go through the tunnel whatever happens. Is he going to get it at the end?


QUESTIONS


Why do you think the author talks about the “woman’s arm” instead of talking simply about the “woman”?

In the lines 20-21 we find the expression “impulse of contrition – a sort of chivalry”. How can you identify contrition with chivalry?

There are two beaches: the big one and the small cove or ravine. It seems that the big beach is for children and the ravine for adults. What characteristics does the author give to each one in order to identify the big one with children and the rocky ravine with adultness?

What kind of relationship is there between the mother and her son?

Jerry tries to talk to the group of boys that are having a swim; but they speak the local language and Jerry doesn’t. How difficult is to make friends with someone who speaks a different language? Do children and young people make friends more easily than mature people?

The gang of local boys have a leader. Do all the gangs have to have a leader? What are the qualities that a leader has to have (according to your opinion)?

There is a moment when Jerry acts out a foolish dog. Why do you think he reacts like this?

Jerry asks (in fact, demands) for some goggles and wants to have them immediately. What is the best way to behave in front of a demanding child?

Do you think that every child needs, in order to grow up, to get through a rite of passage?

The narrator says, “He would do it if it killed him”. Do you think this is a sign of maturity? Was his a sensible decision?

Why, when he could be a member of the gang, “he did not want them”?

It seems that the mother was unconscious of the dangers her child was in. Are we usually aware of the dangers our children are in?

What do you think is the meaning of the blood filling the goggles in relation to coming of age?

Why wasn’t Jerry’s mother impressed when he told her he could stay for more than two minutes under water?

VOCABULARY

blurted out, villa, worrying off, scoop, inlets, surf, craving, poised, bog, blank, feat, nagged, sequins, groped, frond, dizzy, overdo, weed, gout, scooped, glazed looking



The Lagoon, by Joseph Conrad


Joseph Conrad at the Wikipedia: click here

The Lagoon at the Wikipedia: click here

The Lagoon: audiobook on youtube

The Lagoon: review

The Lagoon: analisis






Presentation, by Natalia Huertas

Biography

Jozef Teodor Konrad Nałęcz-Korzeniowski was born on December 3, 1857, in Berdychiv, Podolia, back then Poland occupied by the Russians, now Ukraine.

His father was dedicated to writing and translating Shakespeare and Victor Hugo and at the same time was a political activist in the service of the Polish nationalist movement, for this reason he suffered a sentence to forced labour in Siberia. His mother died of tuberculosis during the years of exile and four years later his father died.

At the age of 17 he travelled to Italy and then to Marseille where he enlisted as a sailor aboard the Mont Blanc ship. By this experience, he found his passion for adventure, travel, the marine world and boats.

In 1878, he moved to England to escape military conscription, there he worked as a crewman on ships iin the ports of Lowestof and Newcastle, he spended his free time reading Shakespeare and because of that at the age of 21 years he mastered English and writing all his work in this language. 

After obtaining English citizenship, he changed his name to Joseph Conrad.

When he was 40, he settled in an English country house and wrote regularly. What he had experienced until then had given him enough material to write several biographies. He has been one of the best English writers of all time.

But he was not loved by everyone, in 1975 a Nigerian writer, Chinua Achebe called him a racist; he said that his book Heart of Darkness was an offensive book full of degrading stereotypes about Africa and Africans.

He died in Bishopsbourne, England, on August 3, 1924, at the age of 66.

The Story

This story is full of symbolisms and reflects the reality of the world we live, a constant struggle of our thoughts and the moral ambiguity that exists when we have to make transcendental decisions for our life.

In this story the author reflects the conflict he felt between, reality and illusion, betrayal and guilt, and guilt versus honour and heroism.

-  Reality versus illusion: through a narrator we can see the difference between what characters believe themselves and what they actually are.

-  Betrayal versus guilt: when Arsat's brother had fallen and Arsat didn't help him, he ran away with his love, and because of that his brother was murdered.

-  Guilt versus honour and heroism: after Arsat's love died, he decided to get some kind of revenge, this way he could regain his honour and his loyalty to his brother.

Literary Figure

Conrad said that his aspiration had always been "a meticulous narration of the truth of thoughts and deeds"

In this story I found many words that define a contrast

-  black / white

-  heroism / cowardice

-  reality / illusion

      - light / darkness 

which is a typical characteristic in the stories that Conrad has written.

Conrad's descriptions of the high seas, the Malay Archipelago, and South America were based on his experiences and observations. For everything else that he couldn't delve into, he used literary sources.

In his novels he represented singular universes, he strove to create a sense of place, his characters often represented his destiny in isolated circumstances.

Fun Facts

One of the most watched films of the last decades, Apocalypse Now, is based on Conrad's novel Heart of Darkness.

In 1995, a series based on the life of Joseph Conrad was broadcast on Spanish television.
«...TVE-1, the first channel of TVE, transmits from today the series El rajá de los mares, which narrates the life of one of the best English writers, Joseph Conrad....» El País. (August 31, 1995)

 

THEMES / QUESTIONS

Characters, plot, scenery.

Do you think possible writing well in a language that isn't your mother tongue?

Exiled writers: to write about your country, is it better to be an exile?

Some say that all the literary works are autobiographical. Is it possible to write something completely non-autobiographical?

According to Sebald, Conrad said he felt his only presence in the Congo was already a crime. Do you feel guilty of the world problems? That is, if you are a man, do you feel guilty of injustices  against women? If you are white, do you feel guilty of injustices against black people?

Is it possible a friendship between opressors and opressed ones?

Is exotism a kind of colonialism?

In some of Conrad books, the protagonist tries to get redemption for some past guilty deeds doing some kind of heroicity. Do you think is it possible to redeem completely our past mistakes? How?


VOCABULARY

wake, astern, pile, demeanor, squat, gnaw, sow, ember, withstand, mournful, leap, fitful, wreath, ripple

 

SEBALD ON  CONRAD
 

W.G. Sebald, in his book The Rings of Saturn, writes a chapter about a period of Conrad’s life and about the singular meeting of Joseph Conrad and Roger Casement. Roger Casement was a British diplomat and an Irish conspirator who worked for the independence of Ireland. There’s a novel by Vargas Llosa, El sueño del celta, where he relates the life of this fighter for the freedom of his country. Well, it’s curious to see how we can understand better situations that don’t have any effect on us or that are very far away from us than situations that are nearer in space or time. But, to go back to our topic: Casement denounced the atrocities committed by the Belgian companies and colons under the rule of king Leopold II during the Congo conquest, and Conrad meet Casement in his travel up the river Congo at the end of the 19th century, and they agreed completely about this point. There’s a book about this horror: El fantasma del rey Leopoldo. Now, when you consider why Belgium or other countries became all of a sudden very rich, you have to suspect...

In his book, Sebald explains that Conrad had to live a very adventurous life. When he was five years old, his father left his business to dedicate entirely to the cause of the independence of Poland, at this moment under the Russian Empire. So, very young already, he saw conspirators, secret conversations, mysterious people, intellectuals, poets, writers trying to overthrow a foreign government imposed upon their country. In this period, the supporters of the nationalist party wore black clothes (that was forbidden by the tsar) as a sign of mourning for the repressed people. In Ireland, in the past, the British government also forbade the green colour. And you know already about yellow. But Conrad’s father (a writer, poet and translator) was arrested and exiled to a very cold town. In consequence of the conditions of this exile, his mother died (she was 32) and four years later his father (he was 49). So Conrad was an early orphan and lived under the tuition of his uncle. However, he got a very good education in languages (e.g. French) and sciences.

When he was 17 he expressed his desire to go to sea, to be a seaman. This was the most extraordinary calling for a member of the Polish gentry and for somebody who had never seen the sea. So she went to Marseilles and worked as a sailor. But, when he wasn’t at sea, he stayed at Marseilles and meet very peculiar people: bohemians, adventures, etc., and... Spanish Legitimists! There were machinations, conspirators, illegal trade, smuggling, etc. Conrad was involved in many of these things and even had an affair with a woman called Doña Rita, an ex-goat shepherd from the mountains of Catalonia, or perhaps Paula, an ex-goose girl from Hungary, (at the present we still ignore if she was the same person); she was Prince Don Carlos’s lover. At the crisis of this love affair, in 1877, Conrad was shot by a rival, or shot himself, in the chest, but he survived.

He went aboard again, now to Constantinople, and then to England, where he lived and learn English for 12 years. At this moment he went back to Poland to visit his family and there he applied for a job with the Société Anonyme Belgue pour le Commerce du Haut Congo. They offered the command of a steamer to go up the Congo River. At the time the Congo was a vast unmapped land. The Société established there a slavery system of work where 500.000 people died every year for exhaustion and cruelties; however, in 10 years, the value of the company shares was ten times higher.

Conrad realized then that, by his mere presence in the Congo, he was guilty of that horror.

After some months, he went back to Europe completely down because of what he had witnessed.