Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts

Marriage à la Mode, by Katherine Mansfield

SUMMARY, by Nora Carranza

It was Saturday afternoon and William was about to take a train in London, as he did many previous Saturdays. He felt sorrow for not having bought a suitable present for the kids, Paddy and Johnny, who awaited happily for the arrival of their dad because of his presents. 

The kids got annoyed when they obtained the same boxes of sweets William used to buy at the station.

As he intended to offer some different gifts, he made his decision for fruits: a melon and a pineapple. That matter of toys and objects for the children wasn’t an easy subject for William. His wife, Isabel, disapproved of the varied toys their children had, and destroyed them considering them typical and usual objects for children to play, a bad influence for the infant’s education and emotions.

It seems that there was a “new Isabel”, with new ideas, living in a new house, surrounded by new friends, a group of young poets, who, for instance, eagerly enjoy the children’s sweets. So, William, with disgust, imagine one of them lapping up a slice of the melon he had already bought.

The train arrived at the crowded platform, William looked for the first-class smoker carriage, where he got comfortable in a corner and began to concentrate in his professional papers, while the usual bad distress in his breast diminished.

After a time travelling, his attention moved from his papers to the landscape, and as every Saturday, the images he contemplated drove him to Isabel. William thought about the New Isabel and the previous Isabel.

William remembered when, some time ago, coming back from his office, he met his loved family in the little white house, the one with blue curtains and beautiful petunias. But then, William had no idea about the inconvenience that little house represented for Isabel. He didn’t imagine Isabel felt lonely, disliked the Nanny and was willing to know interesting people and attend to cultural activities.

William also remembered the holidays the family used to have, how he and Isabel enjoyed being young, eating and sleeping together. But now, the New Isabel would be horrified with this kind of sentimentalism in her husband.

The New Isabel had found congenial people, could go about more, and she lived in a new house surrounded by new amazing friends, a new, large house, where William felt strange and where Isabel accused him of being tragic and dull.

The train arrived at the station, William saw her waiting for him, beautiful and alone, and for a moment, he had the illusion that nobody else had gone with Isabel to the station…, but he was mistaken because all the others ―Bill Hunt, Dennis Green and Moira Morrison― waited outside in the taxi. He could only say, “Oh!”

The taxi went to the shop where Bobby Kane had been choosing sweets because of their divine colours and aspect. He went out to meet the group and, as the shopman ran after him claiming for the money, Isabel has to pay for the sweets.

Isabel laughed when William explained the fruits were for the kids and said they would suffer agonies eating them, although she and Moira were delighted with the melon and pineapple.

After tea, William found himself alone, the kiddies were asleep, and the poets were off to bathe. He went to the sitting room, and there he discovered paintings on the walls and ashtrays full of cigarette ends everywhere.

The bathers came back, altering the quiet of the garden, asking for music, making snob jokes, until they had supper, eating and drinking a lot. Isabel filled glasses and changed plates. In the end, they all felt tired and went to bed.

The next afternoon, waiting for the taxi, William was finally alone with Isabel, but nevertheless he felt there was nothing to say.

Isabel mentioned they almost hadn’t seen each other, it has been so a short time, the children have been out… The next time!

The taxi arrived, Isabel said goodbye, gave a quick kiss to William and went inside.

When he was seated on the train with his arms around the pain in his breast, he began to write mentally a letter for Isabel, the New Isabel.

When the post arrived, the indolent group were sitting outside the house. The letter to Isabel had pages and pages, and began with “My darling, precious Isabel”.

William didn’t want to be a nuisance to her happiness.

Isabel passed through different emotions: fear, astonishment, confusion, and finally she laughed a lot.

She was asked to read out the letter and, as she did, they all went making laugh and fun about the moving William’s words.

Isabel run up to her bedroom, resenting the vain behaviour of her friends, while they were calling her from the garden, “Come for a bathe”!

Isabel knew she should stay and write to William, she had to decide! But, oh, it was too difficult! Better later… and Isabel ran downstairs laughing.

 

In this story, the group of poets appears like indolent, unproductive people. They don’t care about responsibilities in their life, nor respect the person who really works and whom they owe meals, house and entertainments. Even Isabel shares their inconsistent way of life.

I think these are common traits for many artists, like writers, painters, musicians, philosophers, sensitive people, absorbed in their creative mind, that must keep apart from every day’s matters to go on with their artistic or intellectual creation.

But other artists or thinkers can produce excellent works, earning a living by them, and keeping active compromise with the world they live in.

What could be the circumstances or conditions that determine which one of these ways a gifted person has to live in?

 

QUESTIONS

-Do you always take things to your family / friends when you go away? What kind of things do you usually take?

-Should taste be taught? Who decides tastes in a person life?

-How can you define a snob person? Remember, “snob” comes from “sans noblesse”, that is “without nobility”.

-In the story, Isabel has changed after meeting some artists ang going to Paris with Moira. Do you think a friend, a book, a travel, can change radically a person?

-William is a grey, dull person that works in an office. He has traditional points of view and prejudices (“Hysterical”, of a girl running along the station.) And Isabel is lively, extrovert. Can personality decide about your job / loves / happiness? Give examples.

-Isabel new friends are a group of artists. What can you tell about the group of artists in La Dolce Vita? Can you compare the couple in La vie d’Adèle to William and Isabel?

-What is the touchstone to know what is really like a person?

-What do you know about the Ecclesiastes?

-In the station, when William goes back to London, Isabel wants to carry his suitcase. What do you thing about the traditional politeness to women?

-In your opinion, does Isabel really love William / their children? And what about William?

-Why did she laugh reading his letter? Will she write to him at the end?

-According to your view, who is right in their disagreement?

 

VOCABULARY

hard lines, ribbing, scrapped, poky, chambers, pinning, plait, wad, wiles, paper

AUDIOBOOK

ANOTHER AUDIOBOOK (from minute 32:59)

Marriage à la Mode, by William Hogarth

Line of beauty, by Hogarth

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM

Funny Little Snake, by Tessa Hadley

Funny Little Snake in The New Yorker

SUMMARY

Gil (or Gilbert) a 50-year-old history professor, divorced and remarried, feels his duty to invite her only child, a 9-year-old daughter with his first wife and whom he hasn’t seen for 5 years, to spend a few days with him and his new young wife, Valerie, in their house in the north of England, away from London, where his ex-wife lives.

Gil drives to pick up his daughter Robyn, but then, once he’s at home, leaves her to the absolute care of his wife, with the excuse of too much work. Valerie, who didn’t know anything about her nor about children in general, can see now that Robyn is a poor very underdeveloped shy child and is puzzled about how to deal with her. But she tries to do her best.

The day to take her back to her mother arrives, and Gil again, with the excuse of too much work, asks Valerie to do the errand and take the girl back to London by train, and that isn’t a short trip.

So to London they go. There Valerie discovers what kind of person is Marise, Robyn’s mother: a sophisticated ex-hippie who is living with a much younger musician, Jamie, and who doesn’t know her anything about the duties of a parent. Now Valerie understands why the girl is so immature in body and mind.

Valerie has to spend the night at her mother’s intending to go back home the next day, but the next day is snowing, and the trains aren’t working very well, so she has to wait in London. She doesn’t like being with her mother and doesn’t know what to do in the meanwhile. She goes for a walk, and her steps, or her tube, takes her unconsciously to Marise’s. Not knowing why and how, now she’s standing near the house. Robyn is looking out of the window and, after a while, sees Valerie and starts to wave frantically at her. Suddenly, Valerie is thinking about rescuing her.

But we aren’t going to be spoilers…
Is she really going to try and rescue her? What will Marise say and do? What about Jamie? And Gil, would he like Valerie’s idea?

QUESTIONS

How does the narrator show that Robyn is a defenceless child?

Is there any irony in the character’s names? Robyn, Valerie, Gil (Gilbert) Hope, Marise, Jamie…

What kind of relationship is there between Gil and Valerie? How do you know?

And with Marise? Why did they get married, and why did they separate? Why does Gil hate Marise so much now?

Do you think it’s possible to be leftist in politics and traditional or rightist in personal questions?

Gil married two uneducated wives: Why do you think he did so, being himself so educated?

What do you think about this: is a self-made man more or less tolerant with people who haven’t been able to go up in life?

What does Gil think about his mother? And Valerie about hers?

What kind of toys did Robyn have? What games did she play?

In your opinion, why does Gil talks about himself in the third person when he’s asking for a favour to Valerie?

According to Valerie, “important men had to be selfish in order to get ahead”. What is your point of view about this?

What are the differences between sitting room and drawing room? And about tea (in the afternoon / evening) and supper or dinner?

Why do you think Marise and Jamie are partners? Is there love between them?

Does Marise love her child? How do you know?

Do you think Valerie has different manners with Gil when she’s at home from when she’s at Marise’s?

What is the relation of the title with the story?

What is the symbolic meaning of the “stuffed birds and that horse” at Marise’s?

What is the meaning of “Gilbert sitting there steering along in the little cockpit”?

Does the snow and the end of the story work as a symbol? What symbol?

Why, according to your view, does Valerie go to rescue Robyn? And why does Jamie help her? Why does Robyn want to get away with Valerie?
In your opinion, what is going to happen when Valerie gets home with Robyn? How is Gil going to react?
The last sentence says: “Just for the moment, though, the child was inconsolable”? Why was she so?

Another summary

Dido's Lament, by Tessa Hadley

SUMMARY, by Josep Guiteras

Lynette was 30 years old, she was tall, with brown freckly skin; she was original and eager, and she was wearing a wool coat that she had found in a charity shop.

It was winter at 5 pm, after work, when she went into John Lewis store to buy some things she needed. Leaving the stores and heading to the corridors and subway platforms, a man making his way through the crowd hit her, causing great pain in her ankle, so she decided to follow him to demand an apology, but, when she touched him, she realized that it was Toby, her ex-husband whom she had left 9 years ago, possibly because he wasn’t her type. Toby was glad to see her, and Lynette saw that Toby had changed: he has gone from being shy with the air of a country boy to seeing himself as a mundane and prosperous man. Currently, he had created a new production company that brought him a good income.

She had failed in the attempt to being a singer since her voice did not meet the conditions. Now, she had a temporary job at the BBC: in short, things were not going very well for her.

Toby told her that he had married Jaz, and they had two daughters and that he and his wife were very happy. Lynette lied when she said that she had a good boyfriend.

The bars were full of people, so Toby invited her to his house in Queen’s Park because his wife and his daughters had gone to her sister’s house. The house was located in a good area, the exterior appearance of the house was perfect and, inside, it was spacious with an old and modern decoration, and beautiful functional furniture. She realized that what the house contained was Toby’s liking.

Toby thought that he had done well to take Lynette home since in a bar he would have fallen into a flirtation under Lynette’s control, while, in his family’s house, everything was more transparent.

Before leaving, Lynette wrote her phone number on a blackboard. When Toby was left alone at home, he erased the phone number because he did not want to put everything together, family, work and home to maintain a relationship with Lynette. Lynette went to a bar near Toby’s house and saw that she had left the cheap clothes she had bought at John Lewis in Toby’s home.
She thought that Toby would call her, or maybe not. Lynette came to the conclusion that it was better to be free and, if she wasn’t, it was necessary.

QUESTIONS

-Bearing in mind Lynette’s physical appearance, what can you say about her personality?

-Do you think Toby didn’t notice he struck somebody going into the tube?

-The way you see it, what are Lynette’s reasons to follow obstinately the man who struck her?

-In your opinion, did he know somebody was following him?

-Can you always justify someone’s unconsciousness / abstraction?

-What do you think were the reasons for their divorce? Was one of them guiltier than the other?

-Did Toby prosper more than Lynette because of their divorce?

-Her having ancestors from Sierra Leone, does it have any relevance for her personality, for her divorce, for the story?

-She says she isn’t of the marrying kind nor the mothering kind. Don’t you think these situations come from chances rather from our will?

-Why did she lie about having a boyfriend and about meeting some friends of her?

-According to you, why did he invite her to his house, and why did she accept?

-To your mind, why didn’t she tell him about his clashing her in the tube?

-“She was afraid that his loving kindness might enclose her too entirely, like a sheath.” When can love and tenderness be scary?

-She was also afraid of his subordination. Why?

-“Men always run their women together into a continuum.” What does this sentence mean?

-Why does she think “Toby had opted for an easy, chummier life”?

-What is the author’s purpose when she mentions the car accident?

-Do you think that Lynette, when she wanted the divorce, resorted to the old cliché of not being free to give herself to work completely?

-What do you know about Dido’s Lament and about Dido and Aeneas?

-What do you imagine is the relation between the title and the story?

-Can you explain why she gave him her telephone number? And why did he erase it immediately?

-She forgot a bag in Toby’s house and Toby hid it to prevent his wife to see it. Did he still have any feelings for Lynette? What’s his relation with Jaz like?

-Do you think the story has an open ending, or it’s definitely finished?

 

VOCABULARY

John Lewis, fuming, funnelling, tartan, branded, hem, forging, trudging, tearing, Oyster card, escalator, filled out, wizened, dilapidated, smug, temp, temping, Sierra Leone, wincing, thrumming, children's teatime, devious, earnest, taking in, scuffed, rocking horse, goaded, barley sugar, simpering, chummier, juggernaut, ruddy, russet, guesting, accretions, Calpol, ranting, chalkboard

Dido's Lament, from the opera Dido and Aeneas, by Henry Purcell

Matrilineal, by Tessa Hadley

Art Pepper
Art Pepper

SUMMARY, by Nora Carranza

At the very beginning of Matrilineal, we know that Helen had left her husband forty years ago.

At that time, she was married to Phil, and they had two little girls: Nia and Sophie.

The family lived in an apartment at the top floor of a house situated in a nice street of a good neighbourhood. There were beautiful trees and gardens around the building.

To get to their flat, it was necessary to climb up an exterior metal staircase which produced a strong noise at every step they take, no matter how carefully they were. A retired Reverend lived on the flat below theirs. He was always looking through the curtains when the family went up and down, and also complained when they speak aloud, or play music or made some noise on the top floor.

The couple was not very well off, only Phil worked. He was a jazz musician; he played the alto saxophone and gave lessons at a college. Helen was a dancer before having the girls. Since then, she worked at home, took care of Nia and Sophie, took them to play in the gardens or went shopping with them for what was necessary at home, or to visit her mother by bus.

Helen had kept the physical aspect of a dancer and had a natural condition for spontaneous elegance.

The story explains that one grey afternoon Helen was at home; Sophie was sleeping and Nia playing with her doll. Helen used that quiet moment for scrubbing the floor. Unexpectedly, Phil arrived early: one lesson had been cancelled, and he returned happy at home to practise with his alto.

But Helen was not pleased at all with that possibility. They started an old quarrel, about playing music at home, the Reverend complaining, the difficulty of changing home…

When Helen met Phil, she fell in love with him because of his music, his body and movements on stage, the attraction he had over the audience. Now that all seemed evaporated, he accused Helen of killing him, and she threw the scrub at him hitting his head. Nia was astonished.

That same evening, Helen left home with her children and arrived to her mother’s apartment. The father was dead and, the lady, Nana Allen, lived on top of a hairdresser’s and also worked there. Helen didn’t have a close relationship with her mother, they were quite different.

Anyway, that evening the grandmother was helpful with the three visitors. She prepared something to eat, put the girls to sleep and talk to Helen for hours, although they saw facts in different ways.

Nia is who remembers those facts forty years later. By then, Phil was dead (he died of a heart attack in his fifties), Sophie got married and had three children; Nana Allen also died long ago, and Helen is in her sixties. She’s still an elegant woman, has had two important relationships, but didn’t get married again.

When Sophie tells her mother her memories about that evening, Helen didn’t remember it at all; she sincerely believes she was in love with Phil, she loved his music and, besides, she could have had a career as a dancer (not her idea when married).

Nia proposed Helen a trip to New York, to visit a painting exhibition, and there they went.

Nia had started to be worried about that trip because Helen could get ill, or they both could start arguing, even if they went normally well together.

After a rainy arrival at New York, little by little they got confident with the hotel and the city, did many visits and enjoyed the museum. Helen seemed completely satisfied when, after visiting the Met, they got back to the hotel. Nia went out for some food because her mother preferred to stay in bed. Finally, they ate, enjoyed watching television and felt asleep early.

When Nia woke during the night, she perceived the heat and presence of her mother, as when she was a small girl, and happily felt asleep again.

Perhaps the idea of Matrilineal is that some things are transmitted along generations from mother to daughter, in spite of differences and distance, and they need each other along lifetime, mainly when life becomes hard.


QUESTIONS

-“Forty years ago, Helen left her husband.” The narrator doesn’t use the word “divorced”. Do you think they got back together for some time, or they got divorced immediately? How do you know?

-Think about where they live. Why is this scenery important ?

-Can you tell us what mum advices her children about clothes? Do you think it’s a good piece of advice?

-Do you think Helen left dancing because she had children, or because she didn’t like dancing so much?

-They had problems with their neighbours downstairs. What are the typical problems with neighbours?

-“Helen left Phil at about half past six.” Why do you think the narrator tells us the time so exactly?

-In your opinion, did the weather have any influence in the incident between Helen and Bill?

-The narrator says they were poor. What details give us this idea?

-What is your experience / opinion about practising music at home?

-What do you know about Art Pepper?

-Why does Phil attract people? Do you think that is enough to be in love with someone? What do you do with a person of only one quality or talent?

-The college had complained about Phil’s hair. What can you say about etiquette at work / school?

-What method do you have to calm yourself down when you feel extremely irritated?

-When Helen imagined him dying in an accident after a concert, do you think she really wanted him dead?

-In your opinion, do their children understood what happened?

-Does the physical constitution determine a person’s character? I mean, do fat people are nicer / funnier than thin people? Or is it only a cliché?

-Mrs Allen has a special pronged fork. Do you have a very special object, tool, instrument… ? What is the meaning of this tool in the story?

“Love is such a lie. In marriage, it’s a lie.” Is this a universal truth, or only a moment of irritation?

-Singing / writing about love, does it mean one knows what love is?

-Do you think we can efface from our memory moments of our life because they were annoying us or because we feel remorse?

-What do you know about Greenham Common?

-What do you need to do to have a good trip in company?

-What do you travel for? What are you looking for when you travel?

-What is the meaning of the visit to NY in the story?

 

VOCABULARY

pollarded, matching, nonchalant, cut and line, valet, patent, intimation, driftwood, backcombed, slacks, hilly, tugs, chunky, soundproof, portentousness, off-beat, alto, insane, cot, starkly, moorland, muffled, fleece, thrush, leading rein, buoyant, wary, retail, bill, wig, poised, quivering, stubbornness, bleat, nana, quilt, barrel, special pronged fork, adamantly, seersucker, matted, puckery, crossly, perm papers, cheated, crumble, whorls, rougher, dado, pampered, rough, cornered, conveyor belt, shredder, skewed, rakishly, Ladies, surly, seediness, courtroom drama

 

The Other Two, by Edith Wharton

Edith Wharton at the Wikipedia







EDITH WARTON, by Nora Carranza

BIOGRAPHY

Edith Wharton was born in New York in 1862 and died in Saint Brices-sous-Forêt, near Paris, in 1937. She is one of the most notable American novelists. She belonged to an old and wealthy New York family, and she received a refined private education. In 1885, when she was twenty-three, Edith married Edward Robbins Wharton, twelve years older. They divorced in 1902 because of her husband’s infidelities, which affected the writer mentally and physically.
 In 1907, she settled permanently in Paris. She became a close friend of Henry James, and she met other relevant intellectual figures of that time, such as Francis Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway and Jean Cocteau. Since then, Wharton always lived surrounded by aristocrats, novelists, historians and painters.
For her services to France during the First World War, she was awarded the order of the Legion of Honor. She was the first woman to receive her Ph.D. from Yale University, and, in 1930, was named Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Letters.
Edith Wharton became known with the story The Valley of Decision, that appeared in 1902. Since then, she published almost one book per year until her death. She obtained recognition with The House of Mirth (1905), a solid criticism of the American aristocratic classes, starting her most fertile period of her literary activity with titles like The Fruit of the Tree (1907), Madame de Treymes (1907), Ethan Frome (1911), The Reef (1912), Summer (1917), The Custom of the Country (1913), and many more important works.
The Age of Innocence, published in 1920, is considered her best work, which won the Pulitzer Prize in 1921. In it, the author analyses the difficulties of two lovers separated by the prejudices of their society.
The characters of Edith Wharton many times appear like victims of social conventions and injustice, destined to suffering and resignation, in a time of intolerable moral condition.
Edith Wharton is considered the greatest American novelist of her generation.

THE OTHER TWO

The story begins when, after their wedding, Alice and Waythorn spend the first night at their home. Waythorn impatiently awaits his wife’s arrival in the dining room, imagining the pleasure of the moment to come.

Alice had appeared in NY some years before this marriage, as the pretty Mrs Haskett. Society accepted her recent divorce, and, even with some doubts, considered that Mr Haskett was the responsible for that divorce, and she deserved their confidence.

The case was that, when Alice Haskett remarried Gus Varick, the couple became very appreciated in town, but not for long, because there was a new divorce. In this occasion, it was admitted that Varick was not meant for husband life.

Even some decent time had gone by when Alice married Waythorn, there was a kind of surprise and discomfort in the social group. However, by the time of the wedding, every bad consideration seemed to have vanished.

Waythorn has had a kind of grey life, due mainly to his character, and was seduced by Alice’s freshness and balanced personality.

Alice, 35 years old as she declared, had a little girl, Lily Haskett, from her first marriage. The child became ill during the honeymoon of her mother and Waythorn, and had been transferred to their house, according to Waythorn desire.

When Alice arrives to the dining room, she tells her husband that Mr Hackett claimed to visit his child in the house. Waythorn feels astonishment and surprise, he knows nothing about that man, but finally thought the father had the right to see his young daughter and accepted.

The following day, Waythorn was quite distressed, left his house early and planned to came back late, avoiding any possibility of meeting Mr Hackett.

Incredible but true, that morning the past came to the present again, and Waythorn met face to face Gus Varick in the tube, “the elevated” of New York, and again during lunch at a restaurant, where Waythorn had his lunch in a hurry and Varick calmly enjoyed his meal.

The story continues presenting different situations in which Waythorn has to meet the two previous husbands of his wife.

In the case of Mr Haskett, it was due to Lily’s health and his strong determination to intervene in the care and education of his daughter. This will provoke many visits and meetings between the two men. Waythorn observed the humble and simple condition of Mr Haskett, but also his correction about how to behave.

In the case of Gus Varick, it was an indeclinable professional issue that determines obligatory encounters between these men with such different personalities.

Over the time, the anxiety and disgust of Waythorn became transformed into routine and acceptance of the situation with two living ghosts in his marriage.

There was also a change in Waythorn valuation towards Alice’s attitudes. She always stood out for her immediate adaptation to the most complicated situations and her way of disguising the difficulties. That sometimes exasperated and annoyed Waythorn, but finally he accepted the advantages of this way of facing life, maintaining polite and impeccable forms, beyond the complexity of the circumstances.

This is how, at the end of the story, the matters that occupy the characters of the story lead them all to meet in the library of the married couple, and they all had a traditional 5 o’clock tea.

QUESTIONS

Talk about the characters (personality, appearance, relationship between them, job, age, social class, …)

Mrs Waythorn

Mr Waythorn

Lily Haskett

Mr Haskett

Mr Varick

Mr Sellers

What can you say about typhoid?

Why do you think Mr Waythorn fell in love with his wife? Do you think he really loves her or, for him, she is a kind of possession, an object?

In the story, they say that the only presence of the mother will restore the child’s health. Do you believe in “aura” or charisma on people? Did you find it in some person or other?

Where are Pittsburgh and Utica in relation to NY?

Describe Mr Waythorn and Mr Varick’s encounter on the train.

Explain the business that Mr Varick has with Mr Waythorn’s office.

What is the problem with the governess?

What are Mr Waythorn’s debts to the other husbands for the domestic happiness?

What age do you imagine (according to the text) women become slack or febrile?

Why did Mr Waythorn ask his wife something about Haskett with his back to her?

Was the love between Mrs Waythorn and Mr Varick mercenary?

Can you tell us differences and similarities between the three husbands?

Why is there a mention of the novel Ben Hur?

What is Mr Waythorn’s way to deal with his wife’s lies?

Compare Mme Bovary with Mrs Waythorn.

 

VOCABULARY

unblemished, ballast, slack, discrimination, champions, stanchest, crape, complexion, innuendoes, rallied, worn his nerves thin, wooing, proffer, “elevated”, overblown, propinquity, call, beringed, swaddled, alluring, obdurate, apprised, paltriness, “Church Sociable”, “picture hat”, chafing, wrought havoc, deprecatingly, groping, bare, lien, geniality, pliantly, abides, harassed, zest, shed, blunders, jarred, nape